This article has
been published by The Guardian on 22 April 2015 and Newsdiary Online on 14
April 2015
http://updates.hopefornigeriaonline.com/race-for-the-afdb-presidency/THE election to replace Dr. Donald Kaberuka from Rwanda as the President of the African Development Bank (AfDB) will take place in Abidjan during its yearly meetings next month. Eight candidates are vying for the prestigious position of Africa's premier multi-lateral development bank, which turned 50 in 2014.
Based
on depth of professional qualifications and breadth of experiences, Dr.
Akinwumi Adesina, Nigeria's Minister of Agriculture, is one of the
front-runners. He has international development and in-country experience
spread across 14 other Anglophone and Francophone countries in West, East and
Southern Africa.
Dr.
Kamara of Sierra Leone, an economist, should also be a strong contender having
served as Governor of Central Bank, Minister of Finance and Economic Planning
and Minister of Foreign Affairs of Sierra Leone in addition to having worked at
the IMF and the Commonwealth. Mr. Sufian Ahmed has a long-standing public
sector experience; he has been Ethiopia's Minister for Finance and Economic Development
for two decades at a time when his country became one of the darlings of the
international donor community.
Mrs.
Cristina Duarte has private sector experience at Citibank and serves as
Minister for Finance and Planning for Cape Verde. The Tunisian candidate, Mr.
Jaloul Ayul is also a Minister of Finance with private sector experience as
former Citi banker and Managing Director of a commercial bank in Tunisia. There
are three former AfDB's staff members.
Mr.
Kodje Bedoumra, an engineer, brings with him experience of managing
infrastructure projects at the AfDB, which is now the institution's largest
portfolio, and as its former Vice President. He has also served as the
Secretary to the Government within Chad's Presidency, as well as Minister for
Economic Planning, and Minister for Finance.
Mr.
Birama Sidibe, a Malian is now Vice President for Operations at Islamic Development
Bank (IsDB). Mr. Thomas Sakala from Zimbabwe is a veteran and former AfDB's
Vice President for Country and Regional Programming.
There
are three key issues that the AfDB needs to address going forward. First, how
many countries will graduate from its soft lending window of African
Development Fund (ADF) in five to 10 years' time? The ADF lends to poor and
low-income 35 countries - two-thirds of 54 African countries, many of which
cannot borrow from the AfDB window. Graduating from the ADF-window implies that
a country has raised its per capita income to become a middle-income country
and successfully lifted a majority of its people out of poverty.
Second,
what will the AfDB do differently that the World Bank cannot do? The World
Bank's strength, arguably, lies not only with its financial lending (it
provides three times what AfDB provides to some African countries), but also
with its ability to drive and shape the development agenda and in-country
priorities with its policy and knowledge capital.
Third,
why should non-African countries provide additional finance either through the
capital markets or donor funding to the AfDB and ADF and not to the World Bank
or their own respective bilateral development agencies? In essence, what would
be the value-added of a marginal increase in funding to the AfDB? On the other
hand, why should African countries trust the AfDB if they feel that they need
greater voice at the institution?
In addressing these fundamental issues, the
vision statement of Ethiopia's Suffian Ahmed stands shoulder and head above
others, as recently posted on the AfDB's website. His statement is on three
core tasks: "First, focus on our financing on what we are best at and what
will make the biggest difference in Africa... .Second, bringing world class
advisory capacity to the table in support of the countries we work with...
.Third, invest in high quality management and operations---with the whole bank
focused on effectiveness value for money and minimizing costs."
His
statement then addresses four priority areas--infrastructure, agriculture, the
private sector, and supporting fragile states. In each area, he has only three
short paragraphs covering Africa's challenges, his in-country experience in
tackling those challenges, and what he plans to do at the AfDB. The next vision
statement that comes close is that of Dr. Kamara of Sierra Leone, especially in
terms of packaging and presentation. Surprisingly, the vision statements of the
other six candidates read more like mid-term research papers; writing as
technical experts is quite different from writing a vision statement as
presidential candidates for a continental organization.
More
importantly, and beyond professional expertise, experience and vision statement,
the election of the AfDB's president is a high-powered political affair
reflecting an extension of countries' foreign policy and commercial interest
and sub-regional rotation. While Eastern Africa and North Africa produced the
two most recent presidents, Central Africa may claim that it is now its turn.
Being
the largest shareholder and with a positive image from its successful
elections, Nigeria could also note that it is also its own turn, especially
with a South African now head of the African Union, which breaks a
long-standing unwritten rule that the SANE countries - South Africa, Algeria,
Nigeria, and Egypt with a combined GDP of over half of Africa's - should not be
the head of continental organizations.
The
AfDB's president is elected with a double, but simple majority of both African
votes and total votes. In the earlier rounds of voting usually based on country
and sub-regional voting shares and linguistic affiliations, the candidates with
the least vote, possibly from Eastern and Southern Africa (17% of total vote),
West Africa (3.7%) ex-Nigeria, and Francophone blocs (11% of total votes) who
may fully support Mali or Chad, will drop out if North Africa with about 19% of
total vote support for Tunisia.
During
these earlier rounds, Nigeria's Adesina will scale through and possibly to the
final rounds given the country's 9.3% total shareholding (16% of Africa's 60%
vote). Non-African western countries generally prefer candidates from
relatively smaller or low-income African countries with heavy reliance on
official development assistance.
France
may initially team up with Mali or Chad; Arab/Gulf countries with either
Tunisia or Mali given the connection with IsDB; and China with Nigeria.
Zimbabwe's candidate may be handicapped by perception of his country's image with
the western countries, which may support Cape Verde, Sierra Leone or Ethiopia.
However,
if the western countries with about 36% of total votes feel that their
preferred candidate may drop out too quickly because of low votes, they will
most likely coalesce around that candidate very early in the voting rounds to
propel the candidate to the final round.
Dr.
Kaberuka of Rwanda, now with less than 0.2% vote, benefitted from this strategy
in 2005. Ethiopia, Sierra Leone, or Cape Verde may likely benefit from this
networking effect this year.
In
this regard, Cristina Duarte is probably one to watch as the undeclared and
anointed candidate of the non-African western countries partly for being the
only female and a Luso-phone candidate, with both private and public sector
experiences from a country with low voting shares (0.09%).
The
2015 election for AfDB's presidency is indeed getting very interesting and the
best counsel during the campaign process: Trust, but verify.
No comments:
Post a Comment